Flytte Gjennomsnittet Iid

Du trenger en bedre bankillustrasjon av John Tomac Uansett om du ønsker avgiftsfrie ATM-uttak, høyere avkastning eller en vennlig nabolagsgren, har PONEY identifisert institusjoner og kontoer som kan tjene deg best. I dagens lave utbyttes verden kan det være å gi deg en høyere avkastning enn bankkontoen din, når du søker på sofaen din. Den gjennomsnittlige brick-and-mortar sparekonto leverer nå bare 0,08 i renter på en 10.000 balanse, ned fra et målestokk 0,1 i fjor, har MONEYrsquos årlige undersøkelse av de største bankene i USA funnet. Thatrsquos bare 8 år. Kontrollerer kontoer betaler enda mindre. Og avkastningen vil trolig holde seg lav for en stund longermdash når Federal Reserve øker renten, tar det åtte måneder i gjennomsnitt for bankene å øke prisene på pengemarkedsregnskap og 14 måneder for rentekontroll, ifølge en 2013-Fed-studie. Den penurious payout bankene tilbyr gjør fettavgiftene de tar betalt enda mer egregious. Ved murstein-banker går vedlikeholdsavgifter på sjekkekontoer 14,89 i måneden på averagemdash179 per år. Å unngå avgifter krever vanligvis en 3 250 balanse, opp fra 2500 i fjor. (I de fleste tilfeller til og med registrerer deg for vanlige direkte innskudd wonrsquot avbestille avgiftene lenger.) Trenger penger Nesten 75 av tradisjonelle bankkontoer krever fortsatt gebyr hvis du bruker en minibank utenfor nettverket. Og disse avgiftene har vokst til et gjennomsnitt på 2,46 per tilbaketrekking i år, PENGER funnet fra 2.30 i 2014. Disse dollarene legger til: Nesten en tredjedel av ATM-uttak er fra utelukkende minibanker, ifølge bankteknologiselskapet Personetics Insights . Forbrukerne ser ut til å ha blitt inuredmdashcuriously, de rapporterte til og med høyere tilfredshet med bankgebyr, forteller J. D. Power. ldquoCustomers blir vant til det, sier Jim Miller, som dekker banktjenester ved J. D. Power. Kunder har også en tendens til å undervurdere hvor mye de betaler i minibanker, ifølge Personetics Insights. Behov bedre. ldquoTherersquos fortsatt mange gratis kontoer der ute, sier rdquo Bankrate sjef finansanalytiker Greg McBride. ldquoConsumers er ikke gidsler til stigende avgifter og balanse krav. rdquo Bare ved å flytte til en bank uten vedlikeholdsavgifter og ingen minibanker, estimerer PENGER at du kan spare mer enn 360 per år. Å velge en bank kan være en dyp individuell prosessmedarbeider med en karriere med en heltidsjobb, direkte lønnsinnskudd og betydelige besparelser vil ha ulike prioriteringer enn en hyppig reisende som bare vil ha billig tilgang til penger. Men det burde ikke være dyrt. PENGER undersøkte 75 av de største amerikanske bankene for å finne de laveste prisene, høyeste utbyttet og de beste fordelene. Enten du vil ha en teller for å hilse på deg med navn eller en mobilapp for å håndtere all din bank, har MONEY funnet den beste banken for youmdashone som tjener din tilfredshet. Hvordan penger velger de beste bankene penger har undersøkt de 50 største mursteinene og de 25 største nettbankene ved forbrukerinnskudd basert på data fra konsulentfirmaet Novantas. Vi ba bankene om å bekrefte informasjon om kontoutskrifter, minibanker, avdelingstider, mobil-app-funksjoner og andre fordeler. For Best Big Bank. Beste regionale banker. og Best Online Bank. PENGER valgte vinnerne basert i stor grad på vedlikeholdsavgifter og enkelt å avstå fra dem, minibankavgifter og kontokontoer, sparing av avkastningskontoer, fortrinnsrettede lånevilkår, minibankgebyr og geografisk rekkevidde ble betraktet som tiebreakers. Beste frittstående kontoer ble valgt ut fra avkastning, avgifter og minimumsbalanser og andre restriksjoner. For Best Mobile App. Vi vurderte banker med apper som tilbød de viktigste mobilbankfunksjonene og sjekket kontoer som møtte våre gebyr - og avkastningskriterier, og deretter testet appene for enkel bruk. Praktiske vinnere ble valgt ut fra ATM-nettverk, grenlokaler og timer. Prosjektledelse: Susie Poppick Datainnsamling: Shalene Gupta og Nazish Dholakia Her er MONEY8217s plukker for de beste bankene i 2015-2016: Tenningsavspæringsenheter (IIDs) under California DUI Law Ignition interlock enheter (ofte referert til som IIDs) er miniatyr DUI pust testinstrumenter som er installert i bilens dashbord og forhindrer at bilen din fungerer, med mindre du gir en alkoholfri pusteprøve. IIDs blir stadig mer populært som en California DUI straff. I denne artikkelen svarer våre California DUI-forsvarsadvokater på følgende vanlige spørsmål om tennlåsningsenheter og California DUI-loven: Hvis du etter å ha lest denne artikkelen, har ytterligere spørsmål, inviterer vi deg til å kontakte oss på Shouse Law Group. 1. Hva er en antennelåsningsenhet, og hvordan fungerer IIDs Som tidligere nevnt, er en tenningslåsningsenhet en type mini-pusteapparat. Om størrelsen på en mobiltelefon er den installert på rattstammen på bilen din. Hvis dommeren pålegger deg å installere en IID som en del av din California DUI-prøve. du må: ha IID profesjonelt installert, og ha en IID installert i hver bil du eier eller kjører. 1 (Arbeider-eide biler 2 og motorsykler 3 er unntatt fra denne regelen.) Før du starter bilen, må du blåse inn i IID og gi en alkoholfri pusteprøve. Hvis du ikke, vil bilen din ikke starte. Når du kjører, vil IID be om tilfeldige prøver, mellom 5-15 minutter etter at du begynner å kjøre og deretter om hvert 45 minutter etterpå. Når instrumentet ber om disse rullende prøvene, har du seks minutter å gi et utvalg - god tid til å trekke over hvis du ikke føler at du trygt kan gi et utvalg under kjøring. En tennlåsingsanordning er en mini-DUI pustetest som du må ta før og mens du kjører bilen. Hvis du ikke passerer, vil din tenningsslåsenhet ikke deaktivere bilen din. IID vil imidlertid registrere en feil på loggen din som blir rapportert til retten. Det må bemerkes at California Tenning Interlock-enheter er designet for å sikre at bare deg som føreren kan gi din egen pusteprøve. Dette oppnås ved å kreve et bestemt pustemønster for prøven, som har en veldig kort ledning som ikke kommer til passasjer - eller ryggseter, som krever tilfeldige prøver, selv under kjøring, og gjør det til en forbrytelse for å be noen om å bedrage hisher prøve i stedet for din. 4 I tillegg er teknologien til California IIDs så avansert at IID registrerer og registrerer: ethvert forsøk på å koble fra eller tukle med enheten, 5 alle motorer starter og stopper, og alle pustestestresultater. Når du har installert en California IID, må du ta den inn for service minst hver 60 dag. 6 2. Må jeg installere en IID Hvis jeg er overbevist om California DUI En dommer kan bestille deg til å installere en California-tennlåsingsenhet for enhver lovbrudd som er DUI-relatert. Dette betyr at du kan bli pålagt å installere en IID hvis du har en overbevisning i det meste av California, dommeren har skjønn om å kreve en IID etter en VC 23152 eller 23153 DUI overbevisning. Generelt kan en dommer kreve at du installerer en California IID i opptil tre (3) år, uansett hvor heshe mener det er hensiktsmessig å gjøre det. Vanligvis gjøres dette vanligvis kun ved første forseelse dersom: I tillegg til situasjoner hvor en dommer kan kreve at du installerer en tennlåsingsenhet, er det en rekke DUI-overbevisningsscenarier hvor en dommer må kreve at du installerer en IID. Første gang DUI-lovbrudd i pilotprogrammene Et nytt pilotprosjekt for California IIDs trådte i kraft i juli 2010. Denne loven, Vehicle Code 23700 VC, krever at alle personer som er dømt for en førsteforfølgelse California DUI i visse fylker må installere en IID På en hvilken som helst bil driver han andor-stasjoner. Fylkene som den obligatoriske IID-loven gjelder for, er: Los Angeles County, Alameda County, Tulare County og Sacramento County. Dommeren vil bestille en standard førstegangs DUI-lovbryter i et av disse fylkene for å installere en tennelåsningsenhet i fem (5) måneder. Hvis du imidlertid er dømt for kjøretøykode 23153 VC DUI som forårsaker skade, må du installere enheten i ett år. 8 Hvis denne loven krever IIDs for alle første offensiv DUIer, fungerer som en effektiv avskrekkende - noe som betyr at antall gjentatte DUIer er redusert - så vil det etter hvert bli i kraft over hele landet. Fra nå av er det satt til å utløpe 1. juli 2017 - men California lovgiver kan velge å utvide IID pilotprogrammet til hele staten før da. 9 Kjøretøykode 23700 VC er et pilotprogram som krever IID-installasjon for DUI-lovbrytere i fire fylker. Repeterende DUI-lovbrudd i pilotprogrammene VC 23700 (det obligatoriske IID-pilotprogrammet) påvirker også California repeat DUI lovbrytere som bor i et av de fire fylkene nevnt ovenfor (Los Angeles, Alameda, Tulare og Sacramento). I henhold til denne loven må dommeren bestille deg til å installere en California IID i en periode på: ett år etter en andre DUI-lovbrudd, to (2) år etter en tredje DUI-lovbrudd og tre (3) år etter en fjerde eller etterfølgende overbevisning. 10 Og hvis du er dømt for en ny DUI som forårsaker skade, må du installere IID i to (2) år (tre år for en tredje overbevisning og fire år for en fjerde eller etterfølgende overbevisning). Følgende tabell oppsummerer den nødvendige perioden for IID-installasjon for ulike DUI-lovbrudd under kjøretøykode 23700 VC, bare i Los Angeles, Alameda, Tulare og Sacramento Counties: Type DUI-overbevisning Hvis du bor utenfor fylkene som styres av denne nye loven, Det er ingen automatisk krav om at dommeren pålegger deg å installere en IID etter en annen eller senere DUI-overbevisning. Obligatorisk IID for VC 14601 kjøring på en suspendert lisens Det er imidlertid krav til IID-installasjon etter en eller flere overbevisninger for kjøretøykode 14601 som kjører på en suspendert lisens når suspensjon tilbakekallingen ble basert på en DUI-overbevisning. Avhengig av eksakte lisensbrudd - og på hvor mange tidligere DUI andor suspenderte lisensbrudd du har hatt - kan dommeren bestille deg til å installere en IID for en (1) til tre (3) år. 11 Det kan hende du må installere en tennlåsingsenhet som en betingelse for å skaffe en begrenset lisens etter en California DUI. IID som betingelse for begrenset lisens Hvis du er en gjentatt DUI-lovbryter og ønsker å få et begrenset førerkort, vil California DMV kreve at du også installerer en IID. 12 En begrenset lisens gir deg mulighet til å kjøre fra arbeid, skole eller et rettsbestemt alkoholprogram, mens førerkortet ditt ellers er suspendert eller tilbakekalt. 3. Hvor mye koster en California Tenning Interlock Device Cost I gjennomsnitt er kostnaden for en California IID omtrent 2,50 per dag. Noen selskaper lader også om lag 75-100 for installasjon. Du kan også bli pålagt å betale gebyrer for vedlikehold og kalibrering av tennlåsningsenheten. Under Californias obligatoriske IID pilotprogramlov (Kjøretøykode 23700 VC), hvis du ikke har råd til kostnaden for din obligatoriske IID, vil du kun være pålagt å betale en del av kostnadene. 13 4. Hvordan finner jeg en Court-Approved IID-installatør Hvis en California-domstol krever at du installerer en tennlåsingsenhet på bilen, må du gå til et autorisert installatør for å få det gjort. Flere private selskaper er godkjent av domstolene. IID installasjonsfirmaer du kanskje vil vurdere inkluderer: 5. Kan en California IID registrere en falsk positiv De fleste tenningsslåseenheter opererer på brenselcelleteknologi. Brenselcelleteknologi er alkoholspesifikk og påvirkes ikke av ekstern forstyrrelse. Dette betyr at det er liten sjanse for at din IID registrerer en falsk positiv på grunn av sigarettrøyk, parfyme, bensin, etc. Imidlertid registreres en hvilken som helst mengde alkohol som blåses inn i en tennlåsingsenhet. Dette betyr at hvis du bruker munnvann med alkohol i det, spis spritfyllet godteri, eller til og med spis et konditori (noen ganger kombinasjonen av sukker og aktiv gjær produserer lave alkoholnivåer), vil IID plukke opp og registrere alkohol i din Blodprøve. Den gode nyheten er at når alkohol registreres, får du vanligvis muligheten til å retestes nesten umiddelbart. De lave nivåene av alkohol som kan være til stede i disse situasjonene forsvinner raskt. Skyll munnen med vann mellom prøver kan bidra til å fremskynde denne prosessen. Ring oss for hjelp. Hvis du eller en kjære har blitt arrestert for DUI, og ønsker å lære mer om tenningsslåser (IIDs), inviterer vi deg til å kontakte oss på Shouse Law Group. Vi har lokale kontorer i Los Angeles, San Fernando Valley, Pasadena, Long Beach, Orange County, Ventura, San Bernardino, Rancho Cucamonga, Riverside, San Diego, Sacramento, Oakland, San Francisco, San Jose og hele California. For informasjon om Nevada-tennlåsingsenheter, gå til vår artikkel om Nevada-tennlåsningsenheter. Juridiske referanser: California Vehicle Code 23575 VC - Court-mandated bruk av tenningslåsingsenhet. (1) I tillegg til andre lovbestemmelser kan retten kreve at en person dømt for første brudd på DUI-overtredelse av kjøretøykode 23152 eller 23153 installere en sertifisert tenningsslåseanordning på ethvert kjøretøy som personen eier eller driver og forbyder den personen å betjene et motorkjøretøy, med mindre dette kjøretøyet er utstyrt med en fungerende, sertifisert tenningsinnkoblingsanordning. (l) Denne delen begrenser ikke en domstol fra å kreve installasjon av en tennlåsingsanordning og forby bruk av et motorkjøretøy med mindre det kjøretøyet er utstyrt med en fungerende, sertifisert California-tennlåsningsenhet for en person som ikke er underdivisjon (a) eller (b) som tidligere har blitt dømt for kjøretøykode 23152a som kjører under påvirkning.) California Kjøretøykode 23576 VC - Motorkjøretøy eid av arbeidsgiver unntak. (a) Uansett kjøretøykode 23575, dersom en person er pålagt å drive et motorkjøretøy i løpet av sysselsettingens omfang og omfang, og hvis kjøretøyet eies av arbeidsgiveren, kan personen drive det kjøretøyet uten å installere en godkjent tennlåsingsanordning dersom arbeidsgiveren har blitt varslet av personen at personene som kjører privilegier, er blitt begrenset i henhold til § 23575 som krever obligatorisk bruk av en California IID, og ​​hvis personen har bevis for dette underretningen i hans eller hennes besittelse, eller hvis varsel, eller en faks kopi derav, er med kjøretøyet. (b) Et motorkjøretøy eid av en forretningsenhet som helt eller delvis eies eller kontrolleres av en person som ellers er underlagt § 23575, er ikke et motorkjøretøy eid av arbeidsgiveren underlagt unntaket i underavdeling (a).) California kjøretøykode 23575 VC - Domstolsbestemt bruk av tenningslåsingsenhet - underavdeling m. (m) Ved bruk av denne delen omfatter ikke kjøretøyet en motorsykkel til staten sertifiserer en tennlåsingsanordning som kan installeres på en motorsykkel. Enhver person som er underlagt en tennlåsningsinnretningsbegrensning, må ikke bruke en motorsykkel for varigheten av restriksjonstiden for tenningslåsingsenheten.) California kjøretøykode 23247 VC - Krenkelse av kjøretøykode 13352 eller 23575 VC straffesikring. (b) Det er ulovlig for enhver person hvis kjørerettighet er begrenset i henhold til § 13352 på grunn av en California DUI-overbevisning eller 23575 som krever obligatorisk installasjon av en California IID for å be om eller oppfordre enhver annen person til å blåse inn i en tennlåsningsenhet eller å starte et motorkjøretøy utstyrt med enheten for å gi personen så begrenset med et betjenbart motorkjøretøy. (c) Det er ulovlig å blåse inn i en tennlåsingsanordning eller å starte et motorkjøretøy utstyrt med enheten for det formål å gi et operativt motorkjøretøy til en person hvis kjørerettighet er begrenset i henhold til § 13352 eller 23575.) Se samme. (g). Installatøren skal varsle Avdelingen for motorkjøretøy dersom enheten er fjernet eller indikerer at personen har forsøkt å fjerne, bypass eller manipulere enheten, eller hvis personen unnlater tre eller flere ganger å overholde noen krav til vedlikehold eller kalibrering av California Tenning Interlock Device.) Se samme. (g) En person hvis kjørerettighet er begrenset av Institutt for motorvogner i henhold til § 13352, skal en begrensning basert på en California DUI sørge for at hvert kjøretøy med en tennlåsingsanordning som skal betjenes av installatøren minst en gang hver 60 dag for at installatøren skal kalibrere enheten og overvåke enhetenes drift.) California Kjøretøykode 23575 VC - Court-mandated bruk av tenningslåsingsenhet. (Retten skal gi økt oppmerksomhet til å anvende denne sanksjonen til en DUI-overtredelse med første brudd med 0,15 prosent eller mer av alkohol i blodet sitt ved arrestering eller med to eller flere tidligere trafikkbrudd eller til personer som nektet å underkaste seg kjemiske blod - eller pustetester ved arrestering.) California Vehicle Code 23700 VC - Pilotprogram for å redusere kjøring under innflytelse lovbrudd gjennom obligatorisk IID-installasjon for første lovbrytere etablering i Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento og Tulare Counties. (a) Til tross for enhver annen lovbestemmelse skal Institutt for motorkjøretøy etablere et pilotprogram i fylkene i Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento og Tulare for å redusere antallet brudd på første gang og gjentatte overtredelser av § 23152 og 23153, som følger: (1) Avdelingen for motorkjøretøy skal ved overtakelse av domstolene abstrakt overbevisning for overtredelse nevnt i nr. 7, informere den dømte personen om kravene i denne seksjonen, herunder begrepet som personen er obligatorisk for å ha en sertifisert tennlåsingsenhet installert. Avdelingenes registre skal gjenspeile den obligatoriske bruken av enheten for det kreves og tidspunktet når enheten skal installeres av denne koden.) California Kjøretøykode 23702 VC - - Varighet av kapitlet obligatorisk IID installasjon pilotprogram. (Dette kapittelet skal ikke fungere 1. juli 2017, og fra 1. januar 2018 oppheves, med mindre en senere vedtatt vedtekt som begynner 1. januar 2018, sletter eller utvider datoene den blir uvirksom og oppheves.) Se samme. California Kjøretøykode 23573 VC - Krenkelser som krever tennlåsningsenhet. (j) I tillegg til alle andre krav i denne koden skal en person dømt for noen av følgende overtredelser straffes som følger: (1) Ved overbevisning om brudd på avsnitt 14601.2, 14601.4 eller 14601.5 DUI-relatert lisens suspensjoner etter en tidligere overbevisning om brudd på § 23103.5, 23152 eller 23153, en California-våken uaktsom eller DUI innen en 10-årig periode, skal personen umiddelbart installere en sertifisert tennelåsningsanordning i henhold til dette avsnittet i alle kjøretøyer eies eller drives av den personen for en periode på ett år. (2) Ved overbevisning om brudd på kjøretøykode § 14601.2, 14601.4 eller 14601.5 etter to tidligere overbevisninger om brudd på § 23103.5, 23152 eller 23153, innenfor en 10-årig periode eller en tidligere overbevisning av § 14601.2, 14601.4 eller 14601.5 innen en 10-årig periode, skal personen umiddelbart installere en sertifisert tenningsslåseanordning i henhold til dette avsnittet i alle kjøretøy som eies eller drives b du den personen for en periode på to år. (3) Ved overbevisning om brudd på kjøretøykode § 14601.2, 14601.4 eller 14601.5 etter tre eller flere tidligere overbevisninger om brudd på § 23103.5, 23152 eller 23153, innen en tiårsperiode eller to eller flere tidligere overbevisning i henhold til § 14601.2, 14601.4 eller 14601.5, skal personen umiddelbart installere en sertifisert California-tennlåsningsanordning i henhold til denne paragraf i alle kjøretøy som eies eller drives av den personen i en periode på tre år. ) California DMV-nettsted - (Hvis du har blitt dømt for et annet eller påfølgende DUI-brudd og har fullført minst ett år av DUI-suspensjonen din, kan du kvalifisere for et begrenset førerkort hvis du oppfyller disse kravene: Installer en IID på kjøretøyet og gi DMV en DL 920-skjerm for verifikasjon av installasjons-tennnetting (DL 920). Fjern alle andre utestående suspensjonsrevokasjoner på kjøreopptaket. Overhold DUI-programkravene og ha programmet pr send inn enten DML-skjema eller DL 101-skjema til DMV (det som gjelder for ditt tilfelle). Send inn et forsikringsbevis sertifikat (SR 22) utstedt av bilforsikringsselskapet ditt til DMV, og etablere bevis på økonomisk ansvar. Betal alle nødvendige avgifter, inkludert 15 IID restriksjoner gebyr.) Se California Vehicle Code 23700 VC - Pilot program for å redusere kjøring under påvirkning lovbrudd gjennom obligatorisk IID installasjon for første lovbrytere etablering i Alameda, Los Angeles, Sacramento og Tulare Counties, sluttpunkt 8 over. Få rask juridisk helpIsraels rett til landet Jeg var interessert i dag da jeg hørte at den de facto saudiske regjeringen, kronprins Abdullah, gjorde en uttalelse som ble mottatt av mange i dette landet som om det var en erklæring, som om Det var noe nytt, et konsept for fred i Midtøsten som ingen hadde hørt om før. Jeg var litt sjokkert at det var så godt mottatt av mange mennesker som hadde vært nede på denne veien før. Jeg foreslår at det som kroneprins Abdullah snakket om for noen dager siden ikke var nytt i det hele tatt. Han snakket om at under planen Abdullah ville arabere normalisere forholdet til Israel i bytte for den jødiske staten som overgav territoriet den mottok etter Sesdags-krigen, som om det var noe nytt. Men det er ikke noe nytt om muligheten til å gi opp land som rettmessig er Israels land for å få fred. Når det kommer rett ned til det, gjør landet ikke så mye forskjell, fordi Yasser Arafat og andre ikke kjenner Israels rett til noe av landet. De anerkjenner ikke Israels rett til å eksistere. Yasser Arafat og andre kjenner ikke Israels rett til noe av landet. De anerkjenner ikke Israels rett til å eksistere. Jeg vil diskutere sju grunner til at Israel har rett til landet de har, og at det ikke skal være en del av fredsprosessen. Hvis dette er noe Israel ønsker å gjøre, er det deres virksomhet å gjøre det. Men alle som har forsøkt å sette presset på Israel for å gjøre dette, er feil. Vi kommer til å bli rammet av skeptikere som skal si at vi vil bli angrepet på grunn av vår støtte til Israel, og hvis vi kommer ut av Midtøsten - det er oss - vil alle problemene gå bort. Det er bare ikke sant. Hvis vi trekker tilbake, kommer alle disse problemene igjen til vår dør. Jeg har noen observasjoner å gjøre om det. Men jeg vil gjerne gjenta igjen de syv grunnene til at Israel har rett til sitt land. Den første grunnen er at Israel har rett til landet på grunn av alle de arkeologiske bevisene. Alle arkeologiske bevisene støtter det. Hver gang det er en grave i Israel, gjør det ingenting annet enn å støtte det faktum at israelere har vært tilstede der i 3000 år. Myntene, byene, keramikken, kulturen - det er andre mennesker, grupper som er der, men det er ingen feil i det faktum at israelere har vært til stede i det landet i 3000 år. Det forutser eventuelle krav som andre mennesker i regionen kan ha. De gamle filistene er utryddet. Mange andre gamle folk er utryddet. De har ikke den ubrukte linjen til denne datoen som israelerne har. Selv egypterne i dag er ikke rase-egyptere på 2000, 3000 år siden. De er først og fremst et arabisk folk. Landet heter Egypt, men de er ikke den samme rasemessige og etniske aksjen som de gamle egypterne i den gamle verden. Israelerne er faktisk nedstammet fra de opprinnelige israelittene. Det andre beviset på Israels rett til landet er den historiske høyre. Historien støtter det helt og fullt. Vi vet at det har vært et israel frem til det romerske rikets tid. Romerne erobret landet. Israel hadde ikke noe hjemland, selv om jødene fikk lov til å bo der. De ble drevet fra landet i to spredninger: En i 70 A. D. og den andre i 135 A. D. Men det var alltid en jødisk tilstedeværelse i landet. Tyrkerne, som tok over 700 år siden og styrte landet frem til om første verdenskrig, hadde kontroll. Da ble landet beseiret av briterne. Tyrkerne gikk inn i første verdenskrig på siden av Tyskland. Britene visste at de måtte gjøre noe for å straffe Tyrkia, og også å bryte opp det imperiet som skulle være en del av Tysklands store innsats i første verdenskrig. Så britene sendte tropper mot tyrkerne i det hellige land. En av de generaler som ledet de britiske hærene, var en mann som heter Allenby. Allenby var en bibel-troende kristen. Han bar en bibel med ham overalt hvor han gikk, og han kjente betydningen av Jerusalem. Natten før angrepet mot Jerusalem for å drive ut tyrkerne, bad Allenby at Gud ville tillate ham å fange byen uten å skade de hellige stedene. Den dagen sendte Allenby verdenskrigs biplaner over byen Jerusalem for å gjøre et rekognosjonsoppdrag. Du må forstå at tyrkerne på den tiden aldri hadde sett et fly. Så det var de, flyr rundt. De så på himmelen og så disse fascinerende oppfinnelsene og visste ikke hva de var, og de var skremt av dem. De våget ikke å kjempe mot en profet fra Gud, så Allenby fanget Jerusalem uten å skyte et enkelt skudd. Da ble de fortalt at de skulle motsette seg en mann som heter Allenby neste dag, noe som betyr at kvittering sendt fra Godquot eller kvote fra Gud. quot De våget ikke å kjempe mot en profet fra Gud, så neste morgen , da Allenby gikk for å ta Jerusalem, gikk han inn og fanget den uten å skyte et enkelt skudd. Den britiske regjeringen var takknemlig for jødiske mennesker rundt om i verden, særlig til en jødisk kjemiker som hjalp dem med å produsere niter. Niter er en ingrediens som ble brukt i nitroglyserin som ble sendt over fra den nye verden. Men de hadde ikke mulighet til å få det til England. De tyske U-båtene skutt på båtene, så de fleste niter de prøvde å importere for å få nitroglyserin, var på bunnen av havet. Men en mann ved navn Weitzman, en jødisk kjemiker, oppdaget en måte å gjøre det av materialer som eksisterte i England. Som et resultat var de i stand til å fortsette den forsyningen. Britene på den tiden sa at de skulle gi det jødiske folk et hjemland. Det er alt skrevet ned i historien. De var gratulerte over at det jødiske folk, bankfolkene, kom gjennom og bidro til å finansiere krigen. Hjemlandet som Storbritannia sa at det ville sette til side, besto av alt det som nå er Israel, og alt det som var da Jordan-nasjonen - hele greia. Det var det som Storbritannia lovet å gi jødene i 1917. I begynnelsen var det noen arabisk støtte til denne handlingen. Det var ikke en stor arabisk befolkning i landet på den tiden, og det er en grunn til det. Landet var ikke i stand til å opprettholde en stor befolkning av mennesker. Det hadde ikke den utviklingen det trengte for å håndtere disse menneskene, og ingen ønsket virkelig dette landet. Det ble ansett å være verdiløst land. Mark Twain - Samuel Clemens - tok en tur til Palestina i 1867. Slik beskrev han det landet. Vi snakker om Israel nå. Han sa: "Et øde land hvis jord er rik nok, men overgis helt til ugress. En stille, sørgende ekspansjon. Vi har aldri sett et menneske på hele ruten. Det var knapt et tre eller en busk hvor som helst. Selv oliven og kaktusen, de raske vennene til en verdiløs jord, hadde nesten øde landet. Hvor var denne store palestinske nasjonen Det eksisterte ikke. Det var ikke der. Palestinere var ikke der. Palestina var en region som ble kalt av romerne, men den gang var den under kontroll av Tyrkia, og det var ingen stor masse mennesker der fordi landet ikke ville støtte dem. Dette er rapporten som den palestinske kongelige kommisjonen, skapt av britene, laget. Den citerer en redegjørelse for forholdene på kystsletten langs Middelhavet i 1913. Den palestinske kongelige kommisjonen sa: "Veien som fører fra Gaza i nord var bare et sommerspor, egnet for transport av kameler eller vogner. Ingen appelsinlunder, frukthager eller vingårder skulle sees til en nådde landsbyen Yavnev. Hus var gjørme. Skoler eksisterte ikke. Den vestlige delen mot havet var nesten en ørken. Landsbyene i dette området var få og tynt befolket. Mange landsbyer var øde av deres innbyggere. Den franske forfatteren Voltaire beskrev Palestina som kvote håpløst, kjedelig sted. Quot Kort sagt, under tyrkerne, led landet til forsømmelse og lav befolkning. Det er et historisk faktum. Nasjonen ble befolket av både jøder og arabere fordi landet kom til å trives da jødene kom tilbake og begynte å gjenvinne den. Hvis det aldri hadde vært noen arkeologiske bevis for å støtte israelernes rettigheter til territoriet, er det også viktig å innse at andre nasjoner i området heller ikke har langvarig krav på landet. Visste du at Saudi Arabia ikke ble opprettet til 1913, Libanon til 1920 Irak eksisterte ikke som en nasjon før 1932, Syria til 1941. Jordens grenser ble etablert i 1946 og Kuwait i 1961. Noen av disse nasjonene som ville si Israel er bare en nylig ankomst måtte nekte sine egne rettigheter som nylige ankomster også. De eksisterte ikke som land. De var alle under turks kontroll. Historisk har Israel oppnådd sin uavhengighet i 1948. Den tredje grunnen til at land tilhører Israel er den praktiske verdien av israelerne som er der. Israel i dag er et moderne jordbrukslandskap. Israel kan bringe mer mat ut av en ørkenmiljø enn noe annet land i verden. De arabiske landene burde gjøre Israel til sin venn og importere teknologi fra Israel som ville tillate hele Midtøsten, ikke bare Israel, å bli en eksportør av mat. Israel har unarguable suksess i sitt landbruk. Den fjerde grunnen til at jeg tror Israel har rett til landet, er på grunn av humanitær bekymring. Du ser, det var 6 millioner jøder slaktet i Europa under andre verdenskrig. Forfølgelsen mot jødene hadde vært veldig sterk i Russland siden kommunismen, og før da under Tsarene. Disse menneskene har rett til sitt hjemland. Hvis vi ikke skal tillate dem et hjemland i Midtøsten, så hvor Hvilken annen nasjon på jorden skal cede territorium, skal gi opp land De ber ikke om mye. The whole nation of Israel would fit into my home state of Oklahoma seven times. They are not asking for a great deal. The whole nation of Israel is very small. It is a nation that, up until the time that claims started coming in, was not desired by anybody. 5) STRATEGIC ALLY The fifth reason Israel ought to have their land is that she is a strategic ally of the United States. Whether we realize it or not, Israel is an impediment to certain groups hostile to democracies and hostile to what we believe in, hostile to that which makes us the greatest nation in the history of the world. They have kept them from taking complete control of the Middle East. If it were not for Israel, they would overrun the region. Israel votes with America in the United Nations more than England, Canada, France, Germany -- more than any other country in the world. They are our strategic ally. It is good to know we have a friend in the Middle East on whom we can count. They vote with us in the United Nations more than England, more than Canada, more than France, more than Germany -- more than any other country in the world. 6) ROADBLOCK TO TERRORISM The sixth reason is that Israel is a roadblock to terrorism. The war we are now facing is not against a sovereign nation it is against a group of terrorists who are very fluid, moving from one country to another. They are almost invisible. That is whom we are fighting against today. We need every ally we can get. If we do not stop terrorism in the Middle East, it will be on our shores. One of the reasons I believe the spiritual door was opened for an attack against the United States is that the policy of our government has been to ask the Israelis, and demand it with pressure, not to retaliate in a significant way against the terrorist strikes that have been launched against them. Since its independence in 1948, Israel has fought four wars: The 1948 War of Independence, the 1956 Sinai campaign, the 1967 Six Day War, and the 1973 Yom Kippur War. In all four cases, Israel was attacked. They were not the aggressor. Some people may argue that this was not true because they went in first in 1956, but they knew at that time that Egypt was building a huge military to become the aggressor. Israel, in fact, was not the aggressor and has not been the aggressor in any of the four wars. Also, they won all four wars against impossible odds. They are great warriors. They consider a level playing field being outnumbered 2-to-1. There were 39 Scud missiles that landed on Israeli soil during the Gulf War. Our president asked Israel not to respond. In order to have the Arab nations on board, we asked Israel not to participate in the war. They showed tremendous restraint and did not. Now we have asked them to stand back and not do anything over these last several attacks. We have criticized them. We have criticized them in our media. Local people in television and radio often criticize Israel, not knowing the true facts. We need to be informed. I was so thrilled when I heard a reporter pose a question to Secretary of State Colin Powell. He said: quotMr. Powell, the United States has advocated a policy of restraint in the Middle East. We have discouraged Israel from retaliation again and again and again because weve said that it escalates the violence. Are we going to follow that ourselvesquot Mr. Powell indicated we would strike back. In other words, we can tell Israel not to do it, but when it hits us, we are going to do something. But all that changed in December when the Israelis went into Gaza with gunships and into the West Bank with F-16s. With the exception of last May, the Israelis had not used F-16s since the Six Day War. And I am so proud of them because we have to stop terrorism. It is not going to go away. If Israel were driven into the sea tomorrow, if every Jew in the Middle East were killed, terrorism would not end. You know that in your heart. Terrorism would continue. It is not just a matter of Israel in the Middle East. It is the heart of the very people who are perpetrating this stuff. Should they be successful in overrunning Israel -- which they wont be -- but should they be, it would not be enough. They will never be satisfied. 7) BIBLICAL RIGHT I believe very strongly that we ought to support Israel, and that it has a right to the land, because God said so. In Genesis 13:14-17, the Bible says: quotThe Lord said to Abram, quotLift up now your eyes, and look from the place where you are northward, southward, eastward and westward: for all the land which you see, to you will I give it, and to your seed forever. Arise, walk through the land in the length of it and in the breadth of it for I will give it to thee. quot That is God talking. The Bible says that Abram removed his tent and came and dwelt in the plain of Mamre, which is in Hebron, and built there an altar before the Lord. Hebron is in the West Bank. It is at this place where God appeared to Abram and said, quotI am giving you this landquot -- the West Bank. This is not a political battle at all. It is a contest over whether or not the word of God is true. The seven reasons, I am convinced, clearly establish that Israel has a right to the land. Eight years ago on the White House lawn, Yitzhak Rabin shook hands with PLO Chairman Yasser Arafat. It was a historic occasion. It was a tragic occasion. At that time, the official policy of the government of Israel began to be, quotLet us appease the terrorists. Let us begin to trade the land for peace. quot This process continued unabated up until last year. Here in our own nation, at Camp David in the summer of 2000, then-Prime Minister of Israel Ehud Barak offered the most generous concessions to Yasser Arafat that had ever been laid on the table. He offered him more than 90 percent of all the West Bank territory, sovereign control of it. There were some parts he did not want to offer, but in exchange he said he would give up land in Israel proper that the PLO had not even asked for. Barak even spoke of dividing Jerusalem. Arafat stormed out of the meeting. And he also did the unthinkable. He even spoke of dividing Jerusalem and allowing the Palestinians to have their capital there. Yasser Arafat stormed out of the meeting. Why did he storm out of the meeting Everything he said he wanted was offered there. It was put into his hands. Why did he storm out of the meeting A couple of months later, there began to be riots, terrorism. The riots began when now-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon went to the Temple Mount. And this was used as the thing that lit the fire and caused the explosion. Did you know that Sharon did not go unannounced and that he contacted the Islamic authorities before he went and secured their permission to be there It was no surprise. The response was very carefully calculated. They knew the world would not pay attention to the details. They would portray this in the Arab world as an attack upon the holy mosque and use it as an excuse to riot. Over the last eight years, during this time of the peace process, where the Israeli public has pressured its leaders to give up land for peace because they are tired of fighting, there has been increased terror. In fact, it has been greater in the last eight years than any other time in Israels history. Showing restraint and giving in has not produced any kind of peace. It is so much so that today the leftist peace movement in Israel does not exist because the people feel they were deceived. They offered a hand of peace, and it was not taken. That is why the politics of Israel have changed drastically over the past 12 months. The Israelis have come to see that, quotNo matter what we do, these people do not want to deal with us. They want to destroy us. quot That is why even yet today the stationery of the PLO still has upon it the map of the entire state of Israel, not just the little part they call the West Bank. They want it all. We have to get out of this mindset that somehow you can buy peace in the Middle East by giving little plots of land. It has not worked before when it has been offered. These seven reasons show why Israel is entitled to that land. I yield the floor. If Jews should have Israel, shouldnt native Americans get America. Id say thats a stronger case, as its much more recent in history and they never left the land (84) YJ Draiman . September 26, 2016 3:19 AM The Consequences of Appeasement amp Concessions by Israel to the Arabs The Consequences of Appeasement amp Concessions by Israel to the Arabs - Part 1 of 2 The decisions made by the government of Israel since The six day war of 1967 leading up to Gaza war with Hamas July 2014, as well as those of the first ten months or so after the turnover of Gaza in 2004 began, have dumbfounded historians ever since. The PA leader Abbas makes a speech in front of the UN and announces that the Oslo Accord is no longer applicable and that he is not going to abide by its terms. Thereafter, Arab terror and violence, car ramming, knifing, stone throwing and every conceivable method of disturbance and destabilization is being applied. The current Arab terror and violence facing the people of Israel, and the Arab claim to forbid Jews from Temple Mount, is a product of restraint to Arab violence and the concern what world reaction would be, while sacrificing Jewish lives, and diminishing the safety and security of Israel and its people. The appeasement of Israel to the Arabs-Palestinians, in particular, has been so often held up as an example of how not to deal with a rising terrorism and violence that it has become a stereotype. Had Israel stood its ground and responded to terrorism or any violence with utmost force and zero tolerance. Israel would not be facing todayrsquos crisis. As many have said ndash appeasement, concessions and lack of proper response to terrorism is detrimental to Israel its people and the Jewish people worldwide. Israel under International Law has the right to build and live in Judea and Samaria and any other territory formerly within the boundary of the Mandate for Palestine in 1920. As decried by the San Remo agreement, confirmed by the treaty of Sevres and Lausanne and the 1919 Faisal Weizmann Agreement, of which terms are survived in perpetuity. YJ Draiman Read complete article at the following link. gatestoneinstitute. orgcomments70683 (83) Santos Torres . June 11, 2015 1:48 AM I completely agree with Israel right to exist. (82) YJ Draiman . May 13, 2015 12:53 AM Israel must be steadfast in protecting its rights and its people Israel must be steadfast in protecting its rights and its people Many nations and people are questioning Israelrsquos control of its liberated territory. No one is mentioning that the Arab countries had ejected about a million Jewish people and their children from their countries, confiscated their assets, businesses, homes and Real estate. Many of the Jews ejected from Arab countries died while their forced departure from Arab countries, due to hardship, famine and starvation. 650,00 Jewish people and their children of these expelled Jewish people and their children were resettled in Greater Israel. The Land the Arab countries confiscated from the Jewish people 120,440 sq. km. or 75,000 sq. miles, which is over 5-6 times the size of Israel, and its value today is the trillions of dollars. The Jewish people and their children during the over 2,000 years living in Arab countries have suffered Pogroms, Libel claims, beheadings, beatings, false imprisonment and extreme hardship as a second class citizens. They had their businesses and homes pillaged, their wives and daughters raped, sold them as slaves, their houses of worship pillaged and burned, forced conversion to Islam. Today over half of Israels population are Jews expelled from Arab countries and their children and grandchildren. The Audacity of the Arab countries in demanding territory from the Jewish people in Palestine after they ejected over a million Jewish people and their children who have lived in Arab land for over 2,000 years and after they confiscated all their assets and Real estate 5-6 times the size of Israel (120,440 sq. km. - 75,000 sq. mi.), valued in the trillions of dollars. Now the Arab nations are demanding more land and more compensation. The Arab countries have chased the million Jews and their children and now the want to chase them away again, from their own historical land. (81) plazaliz . May 11, 2015 6:05 AM This should be catapulted over social media I cannot imagine why I am just reading Senator Inahofes presentation for the first time. This is the most concise factual address on Israels right to their land Ive read or heard. Its hard-hitting, riveting, inarguable and just the bottom-line facts anyone can understand. Teachers and professors should be teaching this to their students - exactly like this. They would remember. I am going to share this everywhere. Ill wait until Saturday morning when FB and other outlets are traffic heavy. Im going to print it and make copies in stacks to hand out wherever I go (in taste of course, Im not an overzealous messenger whose wacky behavior interfers with the message). So grateful I stumbled on this article. Wow, its powerful. Thank you for sharing. (80) Sarah . May 4, 2015 10:11 PM Very interesting and extremely helpful. I am doing a school research paper on quotWhy Palestine and Israel shouldnt share modern day Israelquot and I found this article to be VERY helpful. Not only did I want to do this as a school research paper, but I also wanted to know, myself, why Israel had every right to the land. Being a Christian, I knew that most of it was because God promised it to the Israelis, but I wanted to delve a little deeper. Thank you so much Mr. Inhofe, for writing this article (79) Raina Warren . April 25, 2015 1:42 PM I agree with this article and all the arguments in it for Israels right to exist, its borders, and its birthright given by God Almighty. America must always be Israels staunchest ally Sarah . May 4, 2015 10:13 PM I totally agree with you. Its good to see that there are others that stand up for Israel when there are so many that dont know days (78) Anonymous . December 31, 2014 11:42 PM Islam the world religion These peoples agenda is to conquer the entire world for allahislam and install a world Caliphateleader to rule over all muslims and non muslims worldwide. The aim is to destroy Israel first and then to finish the takeover of the rest of the world. How naive can the western leaders be or is there something else going on that we are not privy. (77) Evelyn Wenitsky . December 27, 2014 10:01 PM it is so pleasurable to read an article with such truth such accurary, and i have enjoyed this more than many papers I have read. Anytime, write more and explain maybe the world and proper tv channels will publish it thank you, love and light, Evelyn (76) Brah . October 30, 2014 11:40 PM Well, lets assume we give the entire land to the arabs and a nation called Palestine. Take all the Jews to USA or EU. Ofcourse EU amp USA takes so many refugees. well the Palestinian people will still not strife for peace. they will come after the western nations for more bloodshed. (75) M M Zuhair . August 18, 2014 6:23 PM Can you please explain But I do not understand how the people from Europe should have a right to live in Arab lands just because they are Jew where the local Arabs are to be driven out of their mother lands Will it be acceptable in any other part of the world (74) Anonymous . August 9, 2014 6:37 PM The problem is, that in the modern day, civilizaed people reject racism. No Race is better than any other race, and g0-ds master race does not have any particular right to other peoples property. It only exists due to theft and violence and sin. (73) Keith . August 2, 2014 5:05 PM People seem to miss the point. The Palestinians and Islam do not want land. They want the destruction of all western civilization. It is about power and control. You could give them every piece of land through out the world and they would still desire to kill everyone who fails to convert to Islam. Until people recognize this fact, until the supporters of the Palestinians and Islam fall victim to their barbarian tactics and way of life supporters will remain blind to the truth because that is the way it is to be until the end. Lana M. . August 5, 2014 5:40 AM Keith..I completely agree with you. 100 The Arab world needs to learn to share. not everything belongs to them. They seem to be arrogantly thinking that they own all of the Middle East..they dont and never will. Phill Hudson . August 29, 2014 3:56 PM Such an American thing to say I cant believe I just read this your mistaking all Arabs for Muslim extremist. The Arab world as you think of it is perfectly capable of sharing and co-existing with the western world. In Britain particularly where I live we have ha huge population of Muslims and I have to say not once have I ever felt or been threatened by them I certainly dont think they want to take over my country We can look at this from the perspective of the Native Americans, restricted to reservations so the white man could claim land that didnt belong to him. What would the USA do now if the natives tried to take back what was rightfully theirs Religion has no place in politics, it harbors extremism and creates unstable relations between nations. The Jewish people have no right to any state just as the Christians and Muslims have no homeland. A state should be secular and governed without religious prejudice. plazaliz . May 11, 2015 7:08 AM Please dont be naive Better read the Quran. All who do not believe in Islam are infidels and must be destroyed according to the Quran. Currently there are multiple problems in Europe with Muslims insisting on others curbing policies so they are not offended. They want Sharia Law. They believe homosexuals should die it is acceptable for women caught in adultery to be stoned to death (Interestingly the men seem to skate) in the husbands right to beat his wife a woman has no rights infidels cannot be allowed to exist unless they convert and the leadership determines whether or not a conversion is authentic. These arent antiquainted laws, but practiced in Muslim countries and behind closed doors in countries where these barbaric beliefs are illegal. You can espouse the (scary enough) moderate Muslim philosophy all you want, but until there is an uprising within that religion and the people reject much of what is in the Quran, they will follow Islamic bullies just like the nation of Germany followed Hitler. Some Germans opposed Hitler but it didnt much matter, did it And because no one spoke up 6 million Jews were murdered along with 8 million other civilians. Underestimating evil as well as the unwillingness to acknowledging that existing evil has an insatiable thirst for power, could mean the destruction of nations. The majority of Middle Eastern and African fundamental Muslims dont want peace, they want power and control. They dont want to share and live in harmony, they want it all. Anonymous . May 11, 2015 7:24 AM Whats the real question everyone should be asking What is the big deal about the Jews having that teeny tiny piece of land Seriously Jews are not only defined by their religion. They are a race of people descended from the tribes of Israel, they are the people of and from that tiny land, scientifically and historically proven countless times over. Other nationalities have hundreds of thousands of square miles more land in comparison. Here is the real question. why is it such a big deal that the Jews have it This one point continues to be glossed over - no one wanted it until the Jews asked for it and then created an astonishing oasis out of nothing. Why are the Jews persecuted throughout history more than any other race or religion Like Hitler, its about coveting, its about greed and power. What they dont seem to understand is if the Jewish people are destroyed, the land they have enriched will turn back to dust in the hands of those who lust after it. Look what theyve done with that land in 67 short years NO ONE else in the Middle East has accomplished as much, and possibly the entire world. How could anyone doubt when looking at history that they have been unusually, even miraculously blessed, even though so horribly persecuted. Why do you think that is And if you want to go the Native American reclaiming route, that the Israelite squatters rights arent enough, they have also won that land fair and square by sheer military force. They have won unprecedented battles and historically, that means what The winner gets the spoils So why is there even a debate Everyone needs to just back off and let them have, not only what belongs to them, but what they have earned the right to have. But for some reason there is a magnificent double standard in this world, and what is good for everyone else does not seem to be good for Israel. Which brings us back to the question everyone should be asking. Why is that Anonymous . June 14, 2015 2:18 PM To commenter Phill Hudson Yes, the Jewish people certainly DO have a right to a Jewish state. The Christians have ALWAYS had a homeland. If you dont believe me, then just wait until the month of December rolls around. What holiday is emphasized in the United States Here is a hint. It is not Chanukah. Are you Jewish Granted, I am still learning about Israel so I do not know everything about how the country operates. However, it is the ONLY democratic nation in the middle east. That fact is not something to be overlooked. Jews coexist along with people from other religiousethnic groups. The apartheid comments are utter nonsense. (72) Nicole T . July 28, 2014 2:52 PM Get our facts right Franccedilois-Marie Arouet, known by his nom de plume Voltaire was Born: Nov 21, 1694 middot Paris, France Died: May 30, 1778 middot Paris, France Thank you (71) Mohamed Faleh Boughdiri . June 6, 2014 7:01 PM my know is muhamed faleh boughdiri and i support jews and israel and i 150 agree with israel (70) Jim Kay . November 15, 2012 11:54 AM So by the same means of justification, should what we call the United States of America be returned to the native americans. if your saying yes to Israel then you must say yes to my point also. Ivonne . July 30, 2014 11:20 PM Lets return the land to native Americans and Mexicans Ida L. . August 6, 2014 4:09 PM That is not comparable If the Native Americans would take over America, with superior force, settle all over it for 50 years, win four wars defending it, put a democratic government in place, and make the land flourish agriculturally, and then Americans complain and shoot rockets indiscriminately at them, maybe youd have a point. But thats not the case. America became her own independent country years ago, and the Native Americans have learned to deal with it, they made the best of their situation. They know theres no way theyll ever get back leadership over America, and that it would be pointless to try. They dont send terrorist bombers into Washington D. C. There are some things you just have to accept. Once a country is settled, and the people living there have fought multiple wars to defend it, they do have a right to live there - (side point-especially if they have managed to make much more of it than than previous occupants ever did or ever will, and if they promote peace over a culture of death). If you want to argue with their right to live there since they took it over, go to every single country in the world. There is no country that has the same occupants it began with. Every civilization has taken over land from other nations. Thats just the way the world works. You dont see England coming back to the Americans either and going, hey this was our land, you kicked us out and took control, now give it back They understand it is not in their hands anymore You really cant compare America and the Native Americans with Israel and the Muslims. (69) Kerry . June 3, 2012 6:01 PM I am not religious, but Jews need a homeland and contribute much to humanity. Anonymous . July 30, 2014 11:26 PM These people have a right to their homeland. If we are not going to allow them a homeland in the Middle East, then where What other nation on Earth is going to cede territory, is going to give up land Brookline, Boston, Brooklyn, Ny..USA is the promised land. Jewish clans are wealthy and have a strong hold in government. Better quality of life in USA, see statistics how many successful Jewish people in USA, in fact the wealthiest community in USA are Jews Live and let live (68) Anonymous . February 28, 2011 12:24 AM I must agree with(63).God gave it to ISRAEL, like it or lump it GOD, HASHEM will always defend His chosen, ISRAEL. LONG LIVE ISRAEL. (67) AEWHistory . February 1, 2010 9:13 AM What we get for our money. an answer to Helga and others: Often the question is asked, Why must our tax dollars go to support Israel And, more pointedly, What do we get for the billions in dollars of aid that weve given to Israel Leaving aside all of the religious, moral, and ethical issues, the money given to Israel has been one of the best investments this nation has ever made, although you rarely hear the details. Here are a few examples: from Israels inception it has relied on the exceptional clandestine assets of its intelligence community for security, but these assets have scored coups that have benefitted the USA when Israel managedfairly often I might addto procure then state-of-the-art Soviet weapons from Arab states and then passed them on to the American government. Without Israel wed never have had early access to the MiG-21 and a host of other Russian weapons that allowed us to better assess the state of Russias military capabilities. More recently Americans benefit from Israeli experience in urban combat. This was especially valuable leading up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The Israelis already had long years of experience, painfully earned, fighting Muslim insurgents in congested areas, and had formulated doctrines to cope with the changing tactical landscape. Rather than learn these painful lessons ourselves, and pay the price in blood, we were able to use Israeli doctrine to save American lives (and continue to do so). So the next time someone suggests pulling funding on Israel, ask them if they know who serves in the army and how much is that persons life worth, becausewithout most anyone even realizing itour investment in Israel might have actually saved the life of a young soldier you know. Anonymous . May 11, 2015 7:31 AM The best return the U. S. has ever received on an investment is the State of Israel. Hands down. (66) bru . June 20, 2007 9:32 AM beautiful story by senator james inhofe. i agree 100 word for word to the point i can not ad any comments. i will say that the u. s. policy of pressured restraint on israel has hurt them, us and the whole world. terrorists at heart will never change they must be defeated by the whole world as one, put aside our differences and we can in a few days destroy it before it destroys all of us. they are becoming better organized and one day take over a nucleur country like pakistan. lets tell iran to knock it off or we will attack, syria also and lets roll into lebanon and gaza as a united world to once and for all end this. (65) John Edgeley, London, UK . August 15, 2006 12:00 AM Does this apply to the world as a whole Excellent article, but does this mean the original american indian population has claim over North and South America or the Aboriginis have claim over Australia as Archeology suggests they were the original inhabitants and the new settlers were nothing but new squatters, please share your thoughts on this. Anonymous . June 3, 2012 6:06 PM (32) Nathan Abrams . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM Most people wont accept the Senators compelling arguments The Senators article is much appreciated and very well written. May G-d bless you. However, the most compelling of his arguments are based on one underlying principle which most of the world (many Jews included, unfortunatley) will not accept: The veracity of the original Bible - The Torah. Once an individual accepts that particular truth, all other arguments become somewhat trivial and secondary. After all, if we dont accept the Torah then theres really no bullet-proof reason to give Jews more rights to Israel than anyone else. The same way that theres no solid rational reason to view the Europeans conquering North America as more moral than Jews conquering Israel - as another reader so aptly points out. If that person accepted the Torah, then there would be no room for that argument. The bottom line reality is that we Jews have to believe and live Torah. When we do, Mashiach will come and the truth will be obvious to everyone - as stated in various parts of Torah. (31) Kim . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM to hschmidtseacove robertcherryhotmail The economy in Israel today is greatly diminished due to this war prescribed by Arafat. The loss of tourism alone has caused the loss of thousands of jobs and the closing of many tourist related businesses. Todays economy in Israel continues to require the aid of the US. The unemployment rate is quite high and the food banks run out with still many in need that must be turned away. You can help, there are many organizations that will accept your help for those that need it including Aish. Regarding international law and the Hague court I believe the good Senator explained that the land was deeded to Israel by both the British and the UN. This is clearly documented and these are both recognized by the international community as governing bodies. To compare the native american right to their land with the palestinian right to the Israeli land is incongruous. Truly the native american would have more right, since they can prove historicity of occupation. (30) Anonymous . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM Dear Senator Jim Inhofe, I applaud your bold stand on behalf of Israel. I agree with your statements 100 as you presented them recently on the Senate floor, March 4, 2002. I have been so frustrated reading the continual bashing of Israel and medias total disregard to the facts and violations within the PA. Thank you for standing for what is right even though it is not considered these days as polically correct. Shalom (29) Anonymous . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM What a very poignant and informative piece Senator Inhofes seven primary distinctions as to why Israel deserves THEIR land are just some of the numerous reasons for why Israel and the Jewish people should occupy the land. Overall, I couldnt put it better myself -- Mr. Senator: I admire your unrelenting attitude of getting the facts across to anyone and hopefully everyone (28) Mary Johnson . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM Absolutely the TRUTH and about time This is a wonderful piece, and I wish the whole world would take heed May we always support Israel (27) Deacon Moran McMahon . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM Excellent article by Senator James Inhofe I agree 100 with this article. Its what I have been telling people all the time. I will e-mail this article to my friends. The world has to wake up to the reality of the situation. (26) Rob Mahaffy . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM I have been waiting for a member of our government to voice what I have just read in this article and it is way past due. My question is, the PA says that the suicide bombers are independent of of the PA, but if Israel capitulates to them the violence will stop, so they do have control over the terrorists, so why are we talking to these people We are negotiating with terrorists that we should be helping Israel wipe out. (25) Anonymous . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM to hschmidtseacove why Israel gets money from the us Think of all the billions Israel had to spend over fighting wars and terror. Very encouraging article. Takk skal du ha. (24) eric siegel . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM It might be nice to e-mail Senator Inhofe at his website (see above) to thank him for his presentation and support. (23) Shoshana Axler . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM How sad that most of the Jewish community does not have the same breadth of understanding regarding Israel as does Senator Inhofe. How do I send Sentor Inhofe an email thanking him for his words (22) Yolanda Canfield . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM A timely commentary. More valuable because of where it was presented. Its so good I want to memorize it. (21) Donna Roe . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM Jews have the right to Israel Yeah for the writer of this article. I totally agree with him. Israel needs to keep all of the land that God promised them. (20) Linda Ekloef . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM G-d bless you, Sen. Jim Inhofe for being light and salt of the earth We know what happens with salt that loses its saltiness and light that doesnt shine: its worthless. It gives me hope to see people willing to stand up for the truth. (19) Ronit Maman . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM Excellent article - Why cant the Europeans see the truth This was an excellent article that touched all the main points on why Israel has an absolute right to the land in Israel it now possesses (and actually more that it already ceded for peace. The most important fact that the Honorable Senator brougt out was the fact that it was Israelis who pioneered the land and brought Arab workers to work the land in the early 1900s who built the Israel of today. Before that, it was a wasteland. Its too bad all the pro-Arab (pro-dictatorship) European allies like England, France, and Germany cant see the truth that the Senator has spoken of so eloquently (18) herman henkes . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM Answering Helgas question As I see it, the reason Israel still needs our financial support is because the Arabic people are so intent on murdering the Israelis. Israel does not have the resources in time and safety to build a base of tax dollars to completely support itself. Al so, as with all countries the US has used as buffers with our enemies, we support them because they help keep the terrorists away from us. (17) renee smith . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM To Helga. a response Israel has resettled thousands of poor Jewish immigrants over the years. Starting with those who sought to escape the pograms of Europe, then the Nazis. From the former Soviet Union, from Ethiopia, and most recently from Argentina. The Jewish people rescued these oppressed peoples provided food, clothing, jobs, and integration into Israeli society. None of this comes for free. Any aid from the USA is used not for frivilous expense, but to help a nation that seeks to heal the world, while struggling to defend its right to exist. (16) LINDA OLIVER . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM Best Article on this subject that Ive ever read Thank you for the facts. I, too, had been fooled by the media into believing that the land belonged to the Palestinians. Only recently have I come to my senses. This article proves beyond any shadow of a doubt that the land indeed does belong to Israel, the chosen of God. (15) Larry Miller . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM It is ashamed that this article has not been printed in the major newspapers in this country. What most of them print is the garbage given to them by the PLO and their supporters. As the Senator so rightfully spells out--the Arabs have no real right to the land and any concessions given them only fuel their feelings that we want it all and nothing else. It this information could be spread accross our country via the communications industry, possibly our leaders in the white house would also stop bowing to the Arabs who really despise them anyway. Wouldnt it be nice to overrun the oil fields, nationalize them and them sell oil to the world and the arab countries. (14) Shlomo . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM to hschmidtseagrove the provisions for Israel in the U. S. foreign aid bill for 2002 secures approximately 2.3 billion dollars in MILITARY AID. that means that the U. S. gives Israel 2.3 billion dollars worth of American made tanks, fighter jets, warships and superior military technology that are all vital to securing Israels position among her friendly neighbors. The U. S. also gives approximately 750 million dollars in developmental aid. that money is used to create the agricultutal technology necessary for Israel to be economically self sufficient. As Israels technological dominance grows along with its strengthening economy these lesser funds are being slowly phased out. therefore the figure of 3.2 billion dollars is somewhat deceptive in that it implies, as you inferred, that the money is not specifically deliniated for anything whereas in reality most of the money is in the form of military transfers. (13) Miles Herman . March 18, 2002 12:00 AM The Truth. I have FINALLy heard it. But the media U. S. Senator James Inhofes speech of March 4, 2002 greatly lifted my spirits. as it is a big start. I read with disbelief and deep gratefulness the words of the Senator. Finally, FINALLY, a recognition by a high ranking politician of Israels right to exist, and how the policy of the U. S. has not exactly been one of reciprocation for the support of Israel when WE need it The average American citizen, I strongly suggest, has not a clue about most of what the Senator spoke of. The American media has greatly contributed not only to the ignorance by Americans of Israels historic right to existence, but to the great restraint Israel has exercised in the face of the daily acts of terrorism by persons who have no appreciation for the sanctity of life. The Palestinians not only have no claim to the land they may end up with, but they are portrayed as the victims by the media - here and abroad - and the Israelies as the aggressors. And this is how the average American perceives the situation. Overt acts of anti-semitism are at a all time high, according to FBI figures. This has happened many times in Jewish history. The last time 6 million Jews died because the truth was either not known, or people did not want to know or did not give a damn. Israel will not be defeated, make no mistake about that. But it was art to my eyes to read a speech about what I have known for so long to be the truth by a prominent political figure. Thank you, Senator. Takk skal du ha. Miles D. Herman, Esq. Plymouth, Massachusetts USA (12) helga schmidt . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM 3.2 Billion each year Your report Israels right to the land is very interesting and I learned from your report, however, since Israel is today a modern marvel of agriculture and is able to bring more food out of a desert environment than any other country in the world, why do we pay from the peoples tax money still Israel 3.2 bil each year In Israel, there are no starving children the economy is good and they have enough money to build static technical advanced equipment for war purposes, like nuclear bombs etc. Please could anybody answer this question Thank you Helga (11) Robert Cherry . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM Interesting arguments that I dont buy The good Senator has a good understanding of history. He does not, however, talk about international law and the notion of might makes right or the idea that might does not make right. For me, the question is whether the International Civil Court in The Hague would recognize a 3000 year old claim. The Senators major premise is, to say the least, not solid. Are you Americans ready to return all the land that the early Americans took by force from your Native American Indians because they occupied it before the first Whites arrived in what is now your country (10) Tamara Kennedy . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM What an excellent speech. I sent a letter to the senator thanking him for his courage to speak the truth without regard for political correctness, and I hope many others will do the same. (9) JULIUS ROMANOFF . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM Senator Inhofe Comments I found the Senators remarks to be different from all the articles in newspapers, magazines or as reported by radio and TV commentaters. How did a speech given by a Senator in the Senate be completely overlooked by the media It did not state what is the popular view namely that the Jews dont belong in the land. They conquered the Arabs and took their homes. Now the Arabs are fighting a war for freedom. Thus, all terroristic acts are justified. The fallacies in such thinking is clearly defined by Senator Inhofes speech. I just wish there were more leaders who remember and know history as the Senator. I want to commend Aish for printing the speech, and bringing it to my attention. (8) Anonymous . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM I applaud this Senator for speaking out All of Israel should belong to the Jews, theres no question of that I pray for the peace of Israel (7) Anonymous . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM I have had the priveledge to travel to Israel twice. I am sadden by this situation. The Arabs have a lot of countries, and they can keep them. The Jews have one little strip of land. We Jews deserve our land. (6) Mark Newman . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM Thank you for speaking the truth I directly e-mailed the Senator but thought I would share my thoughts with others: I am an American Jew from New York and I just read your March 4, 2002 Senate Floor Statement on Peace in the Middle East. May you be blessed forever What you said is so obviously the truth but no one seems to think the truth need be said or, perhaps, from Presidents and Prime Ministers on down, everyone is afraid that the truth will bring more long term harm than good. You have made clear that Americas, Israels, and the worlds long term interests are best served by speaking the truth and acting upon it. ALL of Israel belongs to the Jews and none of the land must or should ever be given up to anyone else. Its so simple and obvious but reading your words were so inspiring given that they are never uttered publically by people in office. Should you ever run for election in New York, you have my vote Please continue doing your work and may you be successful in persuading more leaders and men in power to your way of outspoken truthfulness. (5) Eliazar Cohen . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM I always thougt the way you wrote. Thank God we people like you defending Israel and its people. God bless you (4) Anonymous . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM This article really touched my heart to know that there are politicians in America that still retain the truth that Isreal Belongs to the Chosen People of G-d and are willing to stand up and speak this truth. The sad part of this is that there are not more poloticians standing up and being counted and also that I did not read this from any American Media Sources. (3) David Schwartz . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM Finally, a rare voice that understands I only hope that Bush, Cheney and Zinni also understand as they seem to favor the Arab mentality. What is sad is that they seem to forget what Jews did for medicine, culture, keeping US going in the Depression, and people like Benjamin Touro, an early US freedom fighter. They seem to want Israel to back down. I am not saying that all of the Palestinian claims are without merit, but they never made the soil fruitful, nor did anything to help the land or their own people. Telling children to blow themselves up is not helping anybody. I only hope that we Jews can hold fast and keep the faith, and that HaShem help all of us, especially at Pesach. (2) Ron Ferstadt . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM The Land Is Ours, Take It Back. We gave our Land for Peace, Eight Years Ago, and recieved the Blood Shed of our People, the younger people have to wake up and smell the coffee, they are the back bone of our country. If we turn a blind eye to the slaughter of our people. you fill in the blanks-------. (1) Jerome Eisenberg . March 17, 2002 12:00 AM PLO can not be trusted to stop terrorism The plot is to reduce the size of Israel. Then continue to use the excuse that terrorists act on their own, even though they continueto receive Arab support. Unfortunately this will continue until either Israel, or the Palastinians are anhilated.